Social Media: Whose Popularity Contest is it?
Friday, September 28th, 2007| New To Snowboardjohn.com? |
| Here are a few posts the other readers recommend you check out. |
Sugarrae recently posted about how Sphinn is a popularity contest. She was responding to the many complaints that people were making about the nature of social news.
Of course, Rae is right about Social media BEING a popularity contest - and - like she says: “so fucking what?”. Sort of.
I mean, everything is a popularity contest - that’s not hard to figure out - what can be murky however, is WHOSE popularity contest is it? And once that’s been figured out, the next question is WHY ARE THEY POPULAR?
Let me give you exhibit A:
This is my recent “domination” of social bookmarking site 76newsalways. The post that got voted up is there along side of problogger.net, engadget.com, and shoemoney.com
Now I don’t tell you this to brag - indeed I had never heard of 76newsalways until I noticed it as an incoming link and investigated it - it’s clearly a small time secondary service.
HOWEVER:
I have noticed other of my posts being voted on in other niche social media services… and… they don’t nearly get the same reception.
And I’m including a recent post of mine that was picked up and syndicated by John Reese within the BlogRush dashboard.
That post got a few Sphinns - and no more - in spite of the fact that it has been linked to so extensively, by quite a few respectable people.
So why do I think some of my posts get voted up social media services - while others of the same quality - go nowhere?
I think it’s actually to do with the person who submitted the news article - rather then the quality of the post itself.
To get votes, you need views, and to get views, you need to get submitted by popular submitters.
This brings me to my next point why, and how, are the social media submitters popular?
To answer this question we must analyze the nature of social media itself:
- Social Media will only allow submission of a URL ONCE - after that - the URL can only be voted on.
- To become a well known submitter you must submit stories that WILL become popular.
- Brand recognizable bloggers like Aaron Wall, Shoemoney, Darren Rowse and so on are in high demand (for the most part) by submitters because those are stories which will get the submitters in front of other submitters because everyone will have to vote on the “once only” submitted story.
- To get a story ranking well in social media, you need to have a lot of”friends” who will vote on it in a short amount of time.
- The easiest way to get a lot of friends in social media is submit good stories that go popular.
Now to a certain extent “unknown” bloggers will get a look in - social news submitters need fresh sources of interesting content - and an easy to read “new kid on the block” may do ok if they get picked up by the right submitter (like I did in 76news)
However, the news submitter IS taking a risk by spending a lot of time reading unknown bloggers and then submitting stories by a blogger no one has ever heard of.
Ultimately, news submitters are trying to increase the their own “trust” and extend their network - so that future stories they submit will get views and votes.
As content providers we can either become a news submitter ourselves - and hence increase our own exposure (which we all do to some degree)… or… we can ignore it completely and continue to focus on producing content. Whatever that may be.
If like me (for the most part) you don’t have the time to build a social news reputation, I’ve found that writing controversially has been effective in getting submits by popular submitters -as has writing counter intuitive headlines like “Why The Give It Away Free Business Model Sucks Ass”.
Good luck however you approach social news - I think it’s a great opportunity and a great addition to the internet.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!