Content Isn’t King: It’s B.S.
Wednesday, September 19th, 2007| New To Snowboardjohn.com? |
| Here are a few posts the other readers recommend you check out. |
What’s with all the people posting “Content is King” everywhere?
When I scroll through a lot of the comments I’ve gotten recently, I see this marching band of people repeating “Content is King” like some kind of droid army.
Let me ask you a question: if content is King… what IS content? Can you define it?
Content is a generalization word that really means STUFF ON A WEB PAGE. So when you’re writing “Content is King”… what you’re really saying is “Stuff is King”. Which is meaningless. It’s so general it could be anything.
So allow me to assign some values to “Stuff” so that we’ve got some kind of a map to work with when we produce content which brings traffic… or generates leads… or creates sales… or gets people talking back you on your blog to create community… or gets people to opt in… or gets people linking to you… or…
HANG ON - I JUST REALIZED THAT WE NEED TO HAVE A LIST OF OUTCOMES WE WANT TO ACHIEVE BEFORE WE CAN START CREATING CONTENT - actually, I didn’t just realize that, I just felt like shouting a little.
Anyway, let me list for you a few things “stuff on a web page” can achieve (in random order):
- Social Media bookmarks - both links and traffic.
- Getting feedback and social proof
- Creating community
- Getting real life word of mouth viral traffic - people talking about you between themselves.
- Creating a bond and trust between you and your reader.
- Getting people signed up for future contacts - through opt in forms, RSS feeds, giving you their phone number, or whatever.
- Generating one way links.
- Influencing someone enough to have them fork over some of their hard earned cash to you (or your business system).
- And much more…
The thing is though, you need to understand that each out come is not only different, it requires a different approach and a different communication toolkit.
For example: when I’m bonding with my readers, I like to write super obscure headlines. The total opposite of hype or controversy. My post The Cannibal Consumerism Polarity Dilemma is a good example of a bonding post. It’s also a good example of a peice of writing that creates a paradigm shift - which in turn increases people’s tendency to regard me as someone worth listening to, simply because of the communication skillz it takes to write paradigm shifts.
Whatever.
The point is: when I execute “Stuff on a Web Page”, I am doing it for a very tangible COMMUNICATION/OUTCOME reason - not simply because I think “Stuff on a Web Page” is the right thing to do. I have a map in my mind of the outcome I’m shooting for - and whether I hit it or not - I’m consciously choosing tools from my toolkit to hit my target.
Notice I didn’t use the word “quality” once. I wonder why that is?
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!


